A federal appeals court’s “background circumstances” requirement for majority-group plaintiffs who seek to prove job discrimination cuts against both Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for a unanimous SCOTUS on Thursday.
The court reversed the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, which had dismissed a heterosexual woman’s claim that she was unlawfully passed over for a promotion in favor of a lesbian woman and subsequently demoted, after which a gay man was hired to fill her original role. The plaintiff alleged that those decisions constituted illegal discrimination on the basis of her sexual orientation, which the Supreme Court has said is a form of sex-based discrimination under Title VII.
The 6th Circuit held that the plaintiff could not show background circumstances to support her suspicion that her employer discriminated against her on the basis of her status as a member of a majority group.
Jackson, however, wrote that such requirements flout the Supreme Court’s case law, which “makes clear that the standard for proving disparate treatment under Title VII does not vary based on whether or not the plaintiff is a member of a majority group.”
The court vacated and remanded the case to the 6th Circuit for further proceedings.
Editor’s note: This story is developing and will be updated.